Cet blogue est disponible dans la langue officielle dans laquelle il a été redigé.
This blog is available in the language in which it was written.

I just read a very interesting interview of Thomas Friedman in the latest issue of Newsweek. Thomas Friedman is a widely respected writer who is a columnist with the New York Times and the author of books and articles on changing international relations. Interestingly, he makes the point that if oil were $10 a barrel, Middle Eastern instability would pretty much evaporate because dictators would not have the money for armies and weapons that give them to confidence to posture and threaten.

But in this interview, he talks of how the use of the term “green” in describing environmental policy is a mistake. In fact, he says that this term was coined by the right wing to diminish and denigrate environmental initiative. Instead he argues that environmental policy is the basis of any successful future economies.

I cannot agree more. It will be the development of new environmental technologies that will spur the investment and efficiencies that will drive the next industrial revolution. This will not make economies less competitive; it will make them far more competitive. Moreover, not fixing climate change will create a level of turmoil that surely will damage economies.

There is much evidence that companies that pursue environmental reform in the conduct of their business greatly reduce costs, enhance efficiency overall and get greater productivity from their employees. There is nothing like doing something beyond just making money that has a way of inspiring people to greater things.

This government continuously argues that we have to wait for China and India to get on board or there is no point in starting. This argument should be made to pale in comparison with the case that if we start before them we will have technologies to sell them when they realize the economic advantages of effective environmental policy, in particular dealing with climate change.

To be successful in dealing with climate change and other critical environmental issues, we have to reframe “green” as an economic issue. Western economies need to lead the way.

Les liens vers les sites web ne relevant pas de l'autorité du caucus libéral du Sénat sont fournis aux utilisateurs uniquement pour des raisons de commodité. Le caucus libéral du Sénat n'est pas responsable de l'exactitude, de l'actualité ni de la fiabilité du contenu. Il n'offre aucune garantie à cet égard et n'est pas responsable des renseignements associés à ces liens, pas plus qu'il ne cautionne ces sites ou leur contenu.

 

Les utilisateurs doivent être au courant de la possibilité que les renseignements offerts dans des sites, non soumis à l'autorité du caucus libéral du Sénat, qui ne sont pas assujettis à la Loi sur les langues officielles et auxquels le Forum des sénateurs libéraux comporte des liens, ne puissent être consultés que dans la(les) langue(s) employées dans ces sites.

 

(NB : Les liens aux documents sur d'autres sites ouvriront une nouvelle fenêtre de votre navigateur.)

Textes récents